![]() 18 at 7:03 AM CST (13:03 UTC) from the Orbital Launch Pad at Starbase, Texas, near the start of a 20 minute launch window. The long-awaited Starship IFT-2 launch happened Saturday Nov. Starship on its way to space during the IFT-2 launch. Nine Haiyang satellites have been launched so far since 2002. ![]() Other Haiyang satellites have different instruments for observing maritime environment dynamics. The Haiyang satellite launched this week is the first of a new generation of spacecraft designed to observe changes in the color of oceans, lakes, and rivers, and is a successor to the Haiyang-1 satellites. The Haiyang series is a constellation of satellites that is designed to continuously monitor the world’s oceans for environmental changes. However, the actual payload that was launched was the Haiyang 3-01 satellite. Possible payload candidates for this flight had been said to be Aiji-2 or Siwei Gaojing-3 01/02, while Yaogan-32 03 A/B and Jishu Ceshi A/B had also been mentioned as candidates. These types of orbits are commonly used by Earth observation and reconnaissance satellites. Launch time was at 03:55 UTC, and the trajectory sent the Haiyang 3-01 ocean observation satellite into a Sun-synchronous polar orbit after a successful flight. The launch vehicle was a CZ-2C with a YZ-1S liquid upper stage flying from SLS-2 at Jiuquan. The first launch of the week happened at Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center in China on Thursday, Nov. The only other flights besides this and Starship that are firmly scheduled so far this week are the Starlink launches out of Florida and California.ĬZ-2C on the pad after tower retraction. 16 is the only Chinese flight on the schedule between Nov. Many Chinese launches are not announced well in advance, and there is always a possibility that the country could add another flight to this week’s manifest, but for right now the flight that occurred on Nov. 18, after Starship IFT-2’s launch earlier that day. There is also Starlink 7-7 from Vandenberg Space Force Base (VSFB) in California on the late evening of Nov. One was a Chang Zheng-2C (CZ-2C) from China, and another is Starlink 6-28 from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station (CCSFS), which launched successfully on the very early hours of Nov. The "early adopter" in this case was the government, which acted in part as funding for development.While the spaceflight world waited for the Starship Integrated Flight Test-2 (IFT-2) launch that happened from Texas this week, three other launches were scheduled, from China as well as both main coasts of the United States. ![]() Received NASA contract during development.ġst demo flight to ISS took place ~2 years later. High value enterprise sales (with only a small list of potential customers)ĭelivery (supply chain) : How was the innovation physically delivered to users?īoth stages are built in the SpaceX facilities in Hawthorne, CA and driven cross-country to the launch site, then assembled on location in the leased SpaceX launch facilities. Upstart in low competition industry (highly visible).Ĭompatible with existing satellite configurations - or just custom-built configs from customers.Ĭommunication channels : How did people find out about it? Relative advantage, in cost, was very high. Innovation : What about the innovation made it amenable to distribution? (Having only a single rocket design hugely cut down on manufacturing, support, and launch costs compared to competitors.)Įxtremely difficult due to complexity and perfection that's required for success. General insight to rethink rocket and engine design from ground up without taking existing practices or designs for granted.īuild a "1 size fits all" rocket that can launch many different configurations, rather than expensive, custom launches favored by incumbents. Highly specialized knowledge in many engineering disciplines. But without Musk it may have taken another 10+ years to get to the same point.Īny unique technical abilities/insights that enabled it? With incremental advancements in engine tech, software, and materials it was only a matter of time before an upstart rocket company used them to lower launch costs. Uses existing launch control and tracking.Īdvancements in software (simulations, design, control).īuilt on 60+ years of aerospace engineering knowledge. Uses existing launch pads leased from NASA (Kennedy) or the Airforce (Vandenberg). Where in the "stack" does it fit in? (Why then?)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |